Terms Of Use Statement Privacy Policy Purchase Agreement
DISCLAIMER: The manufacturers make no claims these products will cure anything. The information on this site is not meant to substitute the advice provided by your own physician or other health professional. It is for informational purposes only. If you have any specific medical problem you should contact your medical advisor. Probioticsforhealth.com is not liable for any direct or indirect claim, loss or damage resulting from the use of this information.
FTC Disclosure: If you decide to purchase any products recommended on this site I
may possibly receive some commission.

Created By Stephen Tuffery
www.stephengraphics.com










Please note this site may not display properly in the AOL browser
Why You Don't Need Anti-
12:00 PM CDT on Monday, May 14, 2007
By JULIE DEARDORFF Chicago Tribune
Soap and
water are fine. The FDA says you don't need most anti-
It's a comforting time to be a germ freak. In addition to anti-
Never mind that trillions of bacteria reside
on our skins and in our mouths and intestines. Or that some exposure to germs helps
us develop healthy immune systems.
In 2004, Americans spent more than $540 million
on anti-
The issue isn't just
that products impregnated with germ-
The association says people confuse anti-
More disturbing, the germ-
This concerns researchers
such as Rolf Halden, assistant professor at the Center for Water and Health at Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The U. S. Geological Survey has shown
that triclosan – which mimics the thyroid hormone and is commonly added to soaps,
toothpaste, deodorant, dog shampoo, cutting boards, clothing, toys and other anti-
Dr. Halden's studies
show a similar dispersal of triclocarban, which is found mostly in deodorant bar
soaps.
Though the amounts turning up are minute, a recent study has shown it's enough
to disrupt thyroid function in frogs. Equivalent data on humans isn't yet available.
As ingredients in products, the chemicals aren't necessarily harmful to humans, scientists
say. But evidence is mounting that "these chemicals are remarkably persistent and
possibly bioaccumulating not only through products [applied to the skin] but environmentally
through drinking water and potentially contaminated crops," said Dr. Halden, a member
of the FDA panel that looked at the benefits and hazards of antiseptic hand soaps.
Also, anti-
The American Medical Association
has opposed routine use of anti-
There is a place for anti-
